Check out the findings of fact related to today’s decision, especially from page 60 onward.
And this is what it comes down to: all the arguments same-sex marriage opponents use are not provable in a court of law. In fact, in many cases, the opposite of their arguments is provable.
The next time you hear somebody calling this proof of an “activist court” take issue with them. What they are saying is that a court should only base its decision on feeling and opinion, not on legal (provable) fact.
The next time you hear somebody say this was an “anti-democratic” decision because it overturned the voters’ will, remind them that democracy has its limits, too. That line is always reached when it abridges the legal right of another person.