Absolut Vodka Ad Episode Reflects Ignorance, Fear

The recent Absolut Vodka ad created for the Mexican market has been pulled by the Swedish spirit distiller after a flurry of complaints by U.S.-based bloggers and conservative pundits. See the L.A. Times story here.

Absolut Vodka Ad (Mexico, 2008)

The ad is a map of Mexico before the U.S.-Mexico War of 1846-48. In the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, ratified by both nations in 1848, Mexico ceded more than 40% of its land to the United States. That land is now the present-day U.S. Southwest, home of at least part of ten different states.

The ad suggests that in a perfect or ideal world, the Mexican nation would still include the ceded territory. It doesn’t overtly speak to or about the U.S., the so-called “immigration debate” being waged within our borders, or the “rightness” of the war in the first place.

Of course, the rabid anti-Absolut responses fueled by conservative media outlets did make such connections. That these groups and individuals “read” the ad as something more controversial or even adversarial is not surprising, given their political outlook. But it is that outlook that is most illuminating.

At the very least, their outrage reflects as much ignorance of the history behind the relationship between the U.S. and Mexico as it reflects a particular myopic interpretation of the same. They don’t understand that past, as much as they don’t understand the present-day connections between the two nations as anything more than one nation (the U.S.) “defending itself” against another (Mexico) who is strategically trying to reconquer the Southwest.

These fears also confront the rising visibility of Latinos and other “brown” faces/bodies within the borders of the United States. This transformation–like the rabid fears which meet it–are not without precedent in the U.S. past. In the early part of the 20th century, as the chaos and poverty of the Mexican Revolution displaced more than 1 million Mexicans; and as Southwestern U.S. business interests saw in this condition the opportunity to recruit plentiful, cheap, and disposable labor; the U.S. population of Spanish-speaking migrants grew to visible proportions. At the time, newspapers in California and Texas drew attention to this flow with stories describing the “invading hordes.”

Today, panic is cultivated by an assortment of right-wing commentators and academics alike, all fearful of the “attack” on “America” and its culture. Political commentators like Pat Buchanan (see his The Death of the West) warn against the impending “reconquista” of the Southwest, while scholars like Samuel Huntington (see his simplistic and selective Who Are We) analyze the “threat” Mexicans pose to “the American way of life.”

Such demographic transformations do not have to be viewed through such fearful, culturally-biased, and, yes, racist lenses. (After all, they are a consistent feature of all history.) They can be opportunities of convergence and recreation, of what legendary Chicana author Gloria Anzaldúa, in her 1987 classic Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza, frames as a process of “healing” the wounds of our interconnected pasts.

Ultimately, these transformations are part of the dynamism of history and of our present. They are a product of the institutionalization of capitalism as the world’s standard; they are linked to centuries of European and U.S. involvement in foreign countries (whether it was done in the name of imperialism, democracy, or free trade); and they are the product of more than a century of using Mexican bodies for work.

Anzaldúa writes:

This land was Mexican once, / was Indian always / and is. / And will be again

3 thoughts on “Absolut Vodka Ad Episode Reflects Ignorance, Fear

  1. For those of you who do not understand this ad, here’s a quick history lesson.

    All of that territory in green in the ad was all of Mexico’s land, fair and square, from its independence from Spain in 1810 up until 1848. White people of the United States started to live in Texas, the southwest, and California when it was Mexico’s land. Mexico said it was alright if they learned Spanish and obeyed Mexican laws. Eventually the white settlers, who looked down upon Mexicans as inferior people, disobeyed Mexican laws, and treated Mexicans without any respect, and in many cases, lynched Mexicans. The white settlers clashed with Mexicans and wanted to take the land for themselves. Mexico wanted to send its army to protect its land, but it was weakened by the fight for independence from Spain. The U.S. offered to buy the southwest region, and when Mexico refused to sell, the U.S. declared war. The U.S. was no match for the weakened country, and Mexico lost about half its territory.

    The following books will teach you more about this:

    Mongrels, Bastards, Orphans, and Vagabonds: Mexican Immigration and the Future of Race in America (2007)

    Occupied America: A History of Chicanos, 6th Edition (2006)

  2. Completely agree with the add, the land stays where it is, it does not move, therefore Mexican land is Mexican land, the fact that humans put a border on it to mark territory does not make it a different territory. Id like to see the u.s. put a fence around the ocean? quit trying to privatize and own the whole world for a minute.

  3. I read a report in a magazine in a book store in México once, speaking of the US government’s knowledge of the existence of petroleum in what are now southwestern US states. There had been an argument by a US general for invasion along the lines of (I’m paraphrasing): “If a nation has natural resources it cannot fully exploit, it is the responsibility or right of a nation with the means of exploiting said natural resources to take control […]”
    Something like that.
    At one point, the US even considered invading all of México, but realized this could mean eventually having to extend citizenship to a people of largely Mestizo and Indian blood, and decided against it. The fact that the vast majority of Mexicans entering the US “illegally” are of either pure Indian descent or of Mestizo heritage is testament to whom the land really belongs to and who really belongs in that land. Mexicans never had to cross an ocean to get to the Americas, white people did.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s